i'm buy late 2015 imac 5k in 10 days, current computer late 2008 macbook usage had been normal home use browsing, watching videos.
i'm interested buy in imac time, confused between getting i5 3.3 ghz or i7 4.0 ghz!
tell self i5 should enough since i'm going use normal use (browsing, watching videos, i'll never use photo or video editing , etc), , tell myself i7 can great me in order future proof, ordering i7 take ages arrive in country, while i5 readily available.
guys, should go i5 or i7?
thank in advance best regard
usage, get cheapest model 27" i5. spend money have wasted on upgrades on other stuff.
#4 i'm not sure ask, or go...is normal keychain storage logs? com.apple.iadidrecords apple persistent state encryption call history user data key com.apple.ids: devicehbi ids: identity-rsa-private-key itunes iad password safari extensions list safari webcrypto master key didn't create of these. normal? me again... also, apparently certified apple employee? certificate id , everything. can log in apple certification registry keychain storage password , have account id?????? may hub? apple using. not losing it. don't think @ least. Forums Macs macOS macOS iPhone Mac OS & System Software iPad Apple Watch Notebooks iTunes Apple ID iCloud Desktop Computers Apple Music Profess...
do prefer iwork ’09, @ least in terms of functionality or prefer new of iwork 2013-15? prefer iwork ’09 in terms of functionality, i’d see think. if you’d read more opinion on old , new versions of iwork, can take @ article: http://jbmachelp.x10host.com/mac/mac-index/software/declining-apple-software-by.html jblagden said: ↑ do prefer iwork ’09, @ least in terms of functionality or prefer new of iwork 2013-15? click expand... there's no doubt apple has "dumbed down" iwork 09 apps latest versions, pages popular of three. perhaps that's why give away suite new mac or ios device. need use office because of compatibility issues did use pages other things, however, don't use @ all. Forums Macs ...
with discussion on islam on last few years, started digging things. started no knowledge of islam. found common thread in of these discussions islam, , seems apply other religions. part of argument that's seems pretty damming these religions created beyond reach of science. designed such know no proof ever found. in addition fact ones i've looked @ have else in common. don't truth till end. there no way confirm right. issue don't allow challenge taught, kill if do. 1 of basic elements of fraud getting believe something. of them start people when young, before brain understand logic , critical thinking. rituals reinforce belief , fend off other thought, if belief had strong argument, why not welcome other thoughts , defend against them logic? thought: if religion people good, why 0.07% of people in prison, non-religious? http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-a...americas-scientists-and-07-percent-its-prison religious pe...
Comments
Post a Comment